On The Shoulders Of Dancing Giants

Title: On The Shoulders Of Dancing Giants: beyond the standard model of physics

Author: Orion Franklin, Syme Research Collective
Date: March 2025

Abstract

Space and time are traditionally viewed as interwoven aspects of a four-dimensional continuum, but what if this framework is an emergent structure rather than a fundamental reality? This paper synthesizes findings from More to C, Beyond Planck’s Limit, and the Castle Bravo Yield Anomaly to propose that space-time is not an intrinsic backdrop of reality but an adaptive, energy-dependent connection state. We explore how fluctuations in the speed of light (𝑐) and Planck’s constant (ℎ) under extreme conditions suggest that space-time itself is mutable, shifting based on information flow, energy density, and scale resolution. By identifying the missing principle that governs the connection between space and time, we propose a new paradigm where space-time emerges dynamically from underlying informational and computational structures.

1. Introduction: Space-Time as a Connection State, Not a Fixed Framework

The standard model of physics treats space-time as a smooth, continuous fabric, with time acting as a progression parameter and space providing a coordinate system. However, three key findings challenge this assumption:

1. More to C: Evidence that 𝑐 is not globally constant but resolution-dependent, shifting subtly in extreme energy conditions, implying that time itself is not an independent, universal flow.

2. Beyond Planck’s Limit: Planck’s constant (ℎ) may be an emergent property rather than a fundamental limit, suggesting that quantum constraints are observer-dependent rather than absolute.

3. Castle Bravo Yield Anomaly: A real-world nuclear event where unexpected excess energy hints at localized variations in 𝑐 and ℎ, implying that nuclear forces, and by extension space-time, are not as rigid as assumed.

These findings suggest that space and time do not exist as separate, fundamental entities but are instead states of connection that emerge from deeper principles.

Key Hypothesis:
Space and time arise from a dynamic, scale-dependent structure that adjusts itself based on energy density, measurement resolution, and information flow. This means that space-time is not a passive stage but an active computational structure that reconfigures based on contextual conditions.

2. The Relationship Between Space and Time: Circular Reasoning & the Missing Principle

2.1 The Circularity Problem

• Space is measured using time (e.g., the speed of light as a conversion factor between distance and duration).

• Time is measured using motion, which is dependent on space.

• This self-referential cycle suggests that space and time may not be distinct entities but expressions of a deeper process.

If time is an emergent property of information flow, then the relationship between space and time is not fundamental, but contextual—adjusting based on the underlying computational structure of the universe.

2.2 A Missing Motivating Principle

We currently lack a motivating principle that explains why and how space and time connect.

• Einstein’s relativity describes space-time as a geometric structure, but it does not explain why space transforms into time under relativistic motion or why 𝑐 appears constant when it may not be.

• Quantum mechanics treats time as an external parameter, failing to integrate it as a true dynamic variable.

This suggests that space and time do not emerge from first principles but from a yet-unknown unifying factor—one that defines their connection state based on scale, energy density, and observer interaction.

3. The Governing Equation for Space-Time Connectivity

3.1 General Form: The Space-Time Connection Function

We propose the space-time connection function 𝒞, which determines the local properties of space and time based on energy, resolution, and information flow:

𝒞(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) = 𝟣 / (𝑐(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) ⋅ ℎ(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼))

where:

• 𝒞 = Space-Time Connection State (higher values mean stronger coupling between space and time; lower values indicate decoupling).

• 𝑐(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) = Scale-dependent speed of light, where fluctuations occur under high-energy or extreme conditions.

• ℎ(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) = Scale-dependent Planck's constant, which governs quantum interactions.

This equation suggests that space-time’s stability depends on the product of 𝑐 and ℎ. When 𝑐 and ℎ fluctuate, deviations in nuclear reactions, cosmology, and quantum mechanics emerge.

3.2 Local Variability: How Space-Time Fluctuations Alter Physics

𝑐(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) = 𝑐₀ (𝟣 + 𝛽 𝐸 / 𝐸ₚ)

ℎ(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) = ℎ₀ (𝟣 + 𝛾 𝐸 / 𝐸ₚ)

where:

• 𝑐₀, ℎ₀ = Standard values of 𝑐 and ℎ in low-energy conditions.

• 𝐸ₚ = Planck energy density (~𝟣𝟢¹¹³ 𝐽/𝑚³).

• 𝛽, 𝛾 = Empirical scaling coefficients describing how much 𝑐 and ℎ shift with energy.

• 𝐸 = Local energy density.

Final governing equation:

𝒞(𝐸, 𝑅, 𝐼) = 𝟣 / (𝑐₀ ℎ₀) (𝟣 - (𝛽 + 𝛾) 𝐸 / 𝐸ₚ) + ∂𝐼/∂𝑡

where ∂𝐼/∂𝑡 represents the rate of observer-induced changes to space-time’s structure.

4. Consequences & Experimental Predictions

4.1 Nuclear Reactions

• Fusion rate modifications due to space-time fluctuations:

  𝑃ₜᵤₙₙₑₗ = 𝑒⁻²ᴨ(√(2𝑚𝐵𝚌)/ℏ)

  If ℎ varies as a function of energy density, quantum tunneling probability changes:

  𝑃ₜᵤₙₙₑₗ(𝐸) ≈ 𝑃ₜᵤₙₙₑₗ(0) ⋅ 𝑒²ᴨγ𝐸/𝐸ₚ

• Changes in fusion efficiency within tokamak reactors:

  𝑅𝚏ᵤₛᵢₒₙ ∝ 𝟣/𝑐²

  If 𝑐 varies in high-energy plasmas, reaction efficiency is altered.

4.2 Cosmology & Dark Energy

• Hubble’s law modified by variable 𝑐:

  𝐻² = (8𝜋𝐺/3) 𝜌 (𝟣 - (β + γ)𝐸/𝐸ₚ)

  This suggests space-time expansion rate depends on connectivity fluctuations.

• Gravitational lensing deviations:

  θₑ ≈ √(4𝐺𝑀/𝑐²𝑑)

  A fluctuating 𝑐 shifts the Einstein radius.

4.3 Quantum Mechanics & AI-Driven Detection

• Quantum entanglement correlation modifications:

  𝑆(𝜌) = -𝑇𝑟(𝜌 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝜌)

  If ℎ fluctuates, entropic uncertainty limits adjust.

• Casimir force detection of space-time variation:

  𝐹 = (𝜋² ℏ𝑐)/(240𝑎⁴)

  Local variations in ℎ or 𝑐 lead to measurable force changes.

Conclusion: Toward a New Understanding of Space-Time

The End of Fixed Constants

The assumption of fundamental physical constants as immutable quantities must be reconsidered. Our findings suggest:

• 𝑐 and ℎ are not static but fluctuate with energy density and resolution.

• Space-time itself is a context-dependent structure, not a fixed background.

This demands a shift in physics from viewing space-time as a rigid geometry to an adaptive, emergent phenomenon influenced by measurement limits, information flow, and energy scales.

Implications for Fundamental Physics

• Quantum Mechanics: If ℎ is resolution-dependent, the uncertainty principle may be an emergent effect rather than a fundamental law.

• General Relativity: The warping of space-time might be better understood as a reconfiguration of the connection state rather than curvature in a fixed fabric.

• Cosmology: The accelerating expansion of the universe may be the result of space-time’s evolving connection state rather than requiring a separate dark energy component.

Practical Applications

The realization that space-time itself fluctuates has profound technological implications:

• Advanced Fusion Technologies: Engineering environments where ℎ and 𝑐 are locally modulated could optimize quantum tunneling rates and improve fusion efficiency.

• Next-Generation Computing: AI-driven models that adapt to space-time fluctuations could unlock new forms of quantum computation beyond classical limits.

• Interstellar Propulsion: If space-time is a dynamic connection state, it may be possible to manipulate it in localized regions, leading to theoretical pathways for warp drive mechanics.

The Path Forward

• AI-Augmented Physics: Future research should leverage AI-driven simulations and high-precision experiments to detect local variations in 𝑐 and ℎ.

• Precision Cosmology: Space telescopes must be calibrated to account for potential space-time fluctuations in their measurements.

• Laboratory Tests: Experiments in controlled plasma environments and high-energy particle collisions should actively search for deviations in fundamental constants.

A New Paradigm for Space-Time

Rather than being a passive container, space-time emerges as a self-regulating, energy-dependent connection state that dynamically shifts with observational scales. By embracing this perspective, physics enters a new era—one where fundamental constants become fluid, measurement dictates reality, and the very fabric of existence bends not just to gravity, but to information itself.

The dancing giants of relativity and quantum mechanics have long dictated our understanding of reality. But perhaps they are not separate entities at all—perhaps they are two perspectives of the same underlying dance, whose rhythm we are only now beginning to understand.

Acknowledgments

This work would not have been possible without the contributions of past and present researchers who have challenged conventional physics and expanded our understanding of fundamental constants. Special thanks to:

• The pioneers of quantum mechanics, relativity, and varying fundamental constants, whose work provided the theoretical foundation for this paper.

• The Syme Research Collective, whose interdisciplinary discussions and AI-assisted analyses have shaped the formulation of these ideas.

• AI-driven computational models, which have enabled rapid simulations and theoretical testing beyond conventional human intuition.

• Experimental physicists and cosmologists, whose meticulous data collection provides the necessary empirical framework for validating or challenging these theories.

We also acknowledge the broader scientific community for fostering open discourse and inquiry into the fundamental nature of space, time, and information.

Some aspects of this paper were assisted by AI-generated research tools, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT, for drafting and refinement.

Explore more at Syme Papers.

References

1. Einstein, A. (1905). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.

2. Planck, M. (1901). On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum. Annalen der Physik, 4(553), 1–11.

3. Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). The Quantum Theory of the Electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 117(778), 610-624.

4. Barrow, J. D. (1999). Cosmologies with varying light speed. Physical Review D, 59(4), 043515.

5. Moffat, J. W. (1993). Superluminary universe: A possible solution to the initial value problem in cosmology. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 2(03), 351-365.

6. Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books.

7. LIGO Scientific Collaboration (2016). Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Physical Review Letters, 116(6), 061102.

8. Chandra X-ray Observatory (2020). Neutron Star Mergers and Gravitational Wave Follow-ups. Astrophysical Journal, 895.

9. ITER Organization (2021). Plasma Confinement and Stability in ITER. ITER Technical Report.

10. National Ignition Facility (2022). Advances in Inertial Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics. NIF Science Review.

Further references will be added as experimental results and peer-reviewed studies validate or challenge these concepts.