More To C

Title: More To C: Unlocking Light Speed

Author: Orion Franklin, Syme Research Collective
Date: March 10, 2025

Abstract

Inspired by our discussion in The Constant Death paper, this paper explores the hypothesis that the speed of light (𝑐) is not an absolute constant but instead appears constant only within the resolution limits of our measurements. We propose a discrete measurement theory where 𝑐 varies subtly at finer scales, leading to unexplained deviations in nuclear reactions, relativity, and faster-than-light (FTL) physics. This framework could resolve missing predictions in fusion, fission, and stellar lifetimes, while also providing a new perspective on quantum mechanics and possible loopholes for FTL travel.

1. Introduction: A Measurement-Based Reality

The assumption that the speed of light is globally constant underpins both special relativity and quantum field theory. However, what if this constancy is an artifact of our measurement capabilities? We explore the implications of this idea across multiple domains of physics:

• Nuclear reactions (fusion & fission): Variations in 𝑐 at fine scales could explain why some experimental results deviate from predicted models.

• Relativity & causality: Discrete changes in 𝑐 may alter the behavior of time dilation, gravitational lensing, and cosmic expansion.

• FTL travel & hidden physics: If 𝑐 is tiered at different resolutions, it may reveal natural "warp corridors" that allow for FTL travel without violating relativity.

This paper mathematically formalizes the discrete measurement of 𝑐 and explores its consequences.

2. Mathematical Model: Resolution-Tiered 𝑐

If 𝑐 is only observably constant within a measurement range Δ𝑅, then we define:

𝑐ₘₑₐₛᵤᵣₑ𝒹 = 𝑐₀ + 𝑓(Δ𝑅)

where:

• 𝑐₀ is the globally assumed speed of light,

• 𝑓(Δ𝑅) represents hidden fluctuations below our detection threshold.

2.1. A Discrete Spectrum for 𝑐

We model 𝑐 as a step function across different scales:

𝑐(𝑅) = ⎧ 𝑐₀, 𝑅 > 𝑅ₘₐ𝚌ᵣₒ (classical scale) ⎪ 𝑐₀ + δ𝑐, 𝑅ₓᵤₐₙₜᵤₘ < 𝑅 < 𝑅ₘₐ𝚌ᵣₒ (quantum scale) ⎨ 𝑐₀ + Δ𝑐, 𝑅 < 𝑅ₓᵤₐₙₜᵤₘ (Planck scale) ⎩

where:

• 𝑅ₘₐ𝚌ᵣₒ is the classical measurement scale (e.g., relativity and astronomy),

• 𝑅ₓᵤₐₙₜᵤₘ is the quantum measurement limit (e.g., particle physics),

• 𝑅ₚₗₐₙ𝚌ₖ is the fundamental scale where discrete fluctuations in 𝑐 become dominant.

This tiered reality could account for why physics appears smooth macroscopically but deviates at finer resolutions.

3. Implications for Nuclear Reactions

3.1. Quantum Tunneling & Fusion Rates

Fusion depends on the probability of quantum tunneling, which is governed by:

𝑃𝚏ᵤₛᵢₒₙ ≈ 𝑒⁻ᴮ/ᴱ

where 𝐵 is the Coulomb barrier. Since:

α = 𝑒² / (4π ε₀ ℏ 𝑐)

a variable 𝑐 implies:

• Changes in the fine-structure constant (α) affect tunneling rates, meaning that fusion efficiency fluctuates unpredictably at different scales.

• This could explain why stellar fusion models occasionally fail to match observational data.

• Controlled fusion reactors (tokamaks, inertial confinement) may be missing a crucial variable in ignition conditions.

3.2. Impacts on Stellar Lifetimes & Energy Output

If 𝑐 varies over cosmic timescales or fluctuates in stellar interiors:

• Main-sequence star lifetimes could be shorter or longer than current models predict.

• Supernova thresholds might shift, altering the mass limit for Type Ia supernovae and their use as standard candles in cosmology.

• Neutron star cooling rates could vary, affecting the behavior of exotic matter phases in extreme-density environments.

• Helium flash and late-stage fusion processes might behave unpredictably, changing the energy balance of older stars.

3.3. Fission & Nuclear Stability

If 𝑐 is not constant, fission rates and nuclear decay chains may also be affected:

• Decay rates of unstable isotopes could fluctuate, impacting radiometric dating and nuclear forensics.

• The critical mass of fissile material may depend on local 𝑐 variations, altering predictions for nuclear reactor stability and weapon yields.

• Heavy element formation in supernovae and neutron star mergers could be affected, leading to potential discrepancies in the observed cosmic abundance of elements.

3.4. Energy Generation & Technological Applications

A fluctuating 𝑐 could open doors to new forms of energy generation:

• Fusion reactor optimization: If certain conditions enhance quantum tunneling by modifying 𝑐, it could lead to improved efficiency in controlled fusion experiments.

• Variable speed-of-light reactors: Hypothetically, engineering environments where 𝑐 varies might allow for novel energy extraction mechanisms beyond conventional nuclear power.

• Exotic propulsion concepts: If 𝑐 shifts can be controlled in a confined system, it could provide a theoretical framework for advanced propulsion systems that manipulate relativistic energy exchange.

These considerations suggest that nuclear physics may require revision in light of possible 𝑐 fluctuations. Testing these hypotheses requires precise laboratory experiments, astrophysical observations, and AI-assisted simulations to detect deviations in nuclear reactions under extreme conditions.

4. Effects on Relativity and Spacetime

If 𝑐 is not strictly constant, several key principles of relativity may require revision. Small variations in 𝑐 could have profound effects on spacetime geometry, time dilation, gravitational interactions, and our understanding of the evolution of the universe.

4.1. Time Dilation Adjustments

Time dilation in special relativity is governed by the Lorentz factor:

γ = 1 / √(1 - v²/𝑐²)

If 𝑐 varies at different scales or in different regions of space, then:

• High-energy particle decay rates could deviate from expected relativistic time dilation models.

• Clocks in different gravitational potentials might show additional variations beyond predictions from general relativity.

• Quantum entanglement timing discrepancies might emerge if 𝑐 subtly changes in different quantum states or energy environments.

These deviations could be experimentally tested by placing ultra-precise atomic clocks in strong gravitational fields or extreme cosmic environments.

4.2. Gravitational Lensing Anomalies

Gravitational lensing occurs when light bends around massive objects due to spacetime curvature. If 𝑐 subtly fluctuates in gravitational fields:

• Some unexplained lensing events might be due to localized shifts in 𝑐 rather than entirely attributed to dark matter.

• Microlensing variations could be an indirect way to detect fine-scale changes in 𝑐.

• Black hole photon spheres might shift depending on how 𝑐 varies near extreme gravitational sources.

Future telescopes and interferometers could analyze lensing data for inconsistencies that point to variable 𝑐 effects.

4.3. Cosmic Redshift Deviations and the Expansion of the Universe

The expansion of the universe is inferred through redshift measurements of distant galaxies. If 𝑐 is not perfectly constant:

• Redshift inconsistencies in distant supernovae might be explained by varying 𝑐 rather than modifications to the standard cosmological model.

• Anomalous spectral shifts in quasars or gamma-ray bursts could indicate local fluctuations in 𝑐.

• Dark energy interpretations might need revision, as the acceleration of the universe could be partially explained by shifts in 𝑐 rather than an unknown force.

Investigating these potential effects requires high-precision spectroscopic data and refined models that incorporate variable 𝑐 into cosmological equations.

5. Possible Implications for Faster-Than-Light Travel

5.1. Warp Mechanics and Natural FTL Corridors

If variations in 𝑐 exist at different scales, certain regions of spacetime may permit localized FTL movement:

• Localized superluminal bubbles: Certain regions of space with naturally elevated values of 𝑐 might function as temporary "warp corridors."

• Quantum-scale FTL fluctuations: Small, transient increases in 𝑐 at quantum scales could imply limited superluminal interactions in microphysics.

5.2. Challenges and Experimental Detection

• Detecting subtle shifts in 𝑐 may require precise atomic clock experiments in strong gravitational fields.

• Investigating astrophysical anomalies where light speed appears non-uniform (e.g., gamma-ray burst delays, cosmic microwave background distortions).

6. Conclusion & Future Experiments

Key Findings

• The assumption of a globally constant 𝑐 may be an artifact of our measurement limits.

• Fusion, fission, and relativity may behave differently at scales beyond our detection resolution.

• Faster-than-light travel may not violate relativity if localized shifts in 𝑐 exist.

Reevaluating Fundamental Physics

The possibility that 𝑐 varies on undetectable scales forces a reconsideration of fundamental physics. Current models assume 𝑐 is invariant across all conditions, but if it subtly shifts at different scales, it could explain unresolved anomalies in astrophysics, quantum mechanics, and cosmology. These variations might account for dark matter-like effects, deviations in nuclear reaction rates, and inconsistencies in gravitational lensing that current physics cannot fully explain.

Broader Implications

If the speed of light (𝑐) is not a universal constant but instead fluctuates at undetectable scales as a function of energy density (𝐸), our entire framework for physics may require reevaluation. We propose a dynamic relationship:

𝑑𝑐/𝑑𝐸 = 𝑓(𝐸), where 𝑓(𝐸) ∝ 𝐸⁻ᵝ

where 𝛽 is an empirical scaling exponent. This suggests that in regions of extreme energy density, 𝑐 could deviate subtly from its traditionally assumed constant value, impacting fundamental interactions at nuclear, astrophysical, and cosmological scales.

• Linking Quantum Mechanics & General Relativity: If 𝑐 varies with energy density, it may provide a missing link between macroscopic gravitational effects and microscopic quantum interactions, offering a new framework for unification.

• Rethinking Astrophysical Anomalies: Variations in 𝑐 at different cosmic energy densities could explain gravitational anomalies, unexpected lensing behaviors, and potential "warp corridors" where localized shifts in light speed allow for transient FTL motion.

• New Frontiers in Energy & Propulsion: Understanding and controlling shifts in 𝑐 as a function of 𝐸 could revolutionize nuclear engineering, allowing for optimized fusion conditions, enhanced particle acceleration, and new propulsion technologies that leverage energy-density-dependent variations in fundamental constants.

• Dark Matter & Dark Energy: If 𝑐 dynamically shifts in high-energy-density regions, it may provide an alternative explanation for observed cosmic expansion and large-scale gravitational effects, reducing reliance on yet-undetected particles or exotic fields to account for dark matter and dark energy phenomena.

By defining 𝑐 as an energy-dependent quantity, we propose that its subtle variations manifest in extreme conditions, revealing deviations that are imperceptible under ordinary measurement constraints but crucial in high-energy physics, astrophysics, and cosmology.

AI-Powered Experimental Design

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can dramatically accelerate the search for variable 𝑐 signatures by:

• Analyzing massive astrophysical datasets to detect unexplained variations in gravitational lensing, cosmic microwave background shifts, and pulsar timing.

• Modeling 𝑐 fluctuations using neural networks trained on high-energy particle decay, searching for deviations from relativistic time dilation predictions.

• Optimizing precision experiments to determine the best locations for atomic clock placement (e.g., space-based platforms near strong gravitational fields).

• Automating large-scale simulations to explore how variable 𝑐 affects nuclear reactions, spacetime distortions, and potential FTL mechanisms.

Future Research Directions

To test the hypothesis of variable 𝑐, we propose the following research initiatives:

1. Precision Atomic Clocks in Space – Deploying clocks in extreme environments (near black holes, in cosmic ray pathways) to measure potential 𝑐 fluctuations.

2. AI-Driven Data Mining – Leveraging machine learning to analyze astrophysical datasets, identifying subtle variations in redshift, lensing effects, and gamma-ray burst timing.

3. Quantum Laboratory Experiments – Using ultra-cold atoms and entangled photons to test for 𝑐 fluctuations in controlled environments.

4. High-Energy Particle Collisions – Investigating whether 𝑐 fluctuates in particle accelerators, where matter reaches near-relativistic speeds.

5. Engineering Controlled 𝑐 Shifts – Exploring whether plasma fields, extreme EM fields, or other methods can induce localized shifts in 𝑐, unlocking new technological applications.

If future research confirms that 𝑐 fluctuates at small but meaningful scales, it would represent a paradigm shift in our understanding of the physical universe—one that could reshape both fundamental physics and practical technologies in ways currently unimaginable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express gratitude to the pioneers of theoretical physics and cosmology whose work has laid the foundation for these ideas. Special thanks to researchers in varying speed of light (VSL) cosmology, nuclear physics, and experimental relativity. Additionally, appreciation is extended to AI-assisted simulation platforms for enabling rapid computational models of physical systems.

Some aspects of this paper were assisted by AI-generated research tools, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT, for drafting and refinement.

Explore more at Syme Papers.

References

1. Einstein, A. (1905). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.

2. Planck, M. (1899). Über irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

3. Barrow, J. D. (1999). Cosmologies with varying light speed. Physical Review D, 59(4), 043515.

4. Moffat, J. W. (1993). Superluminary universe: A possible solution to the initial value problem in cosmology. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 2(03), 351-365.

5. Carroll, S. (2004). Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Addison-Wesley.

6. Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books.