Global Gravity Anomalies
Title: Global Gravity Anomalies: Testing the Variability of Fundamental Constants
Author: Orion Franklin, Syme Research Collective
Date: March 2025
Abstract
Recent advances in satellite geodesy and precision atomic clock experiments have revealed persistent gravitational anomalies across multiple regions of the Earth. The Indian Ocean Geoid Low (IOGL), the Hudson Bay Gravity Anomaly, the South Atlantic Anomaly, the Wilkes Land Gravity Anomaly, and the Mariana Trench all exhibit significant deviations from standard gravitational models. Traditional explanations, including mantle convection and post-glacial rebound, fail to fully account for the observed data.
Building on the More to C Hypothesis, which suggests that fundamental constants such as the speed of light (c), Planck’s constant (h), and the gravitational constant (G) may fluctuate under extreme energy densities, this paper proposes that these gravity anomalies may serve as test cases for local variations in fundamental constants. We explore how these deviations challenge the assumption of G as a universal constant and investigate whether these sites exhibit subtle fluctuations in time dilation, energy-mass coupling, and gravitational field strength. Additionally, we outline AI-driven methodologies to map and predict these variations, providing a framework for a new era of precision gravitational physics.
1. Introduction: A Global Framework for Gravitational Anomalies
Gravitational anomalies have been observed across multiple geophysical locations on Earth, each displaying significant deviations from expected values based on mass distribution models. These sites, identified through satellite geodesy, seismic imaging, and atomic clock data, provide potential evidence for non-uniformity in gravitational physics.
Key questions driving this research:
Are gravitational anomalies purely geophysical in origin, or do they reflect deeper fundamental physics?
Could these anomalies serve as natural laboratories for testing variability in G, c, and h?
How can AI-driven models improve our understanding and prediction of gravity anomalies?
This paper explores five key gravitational anomalies and evaluates their potential connection to fundamental constant variability.
2. Major Gravitational Anomalies: An Overview
2.1 The Indian Ocean Geoid Low (IOGL)
The largest known gravity anomaly on Earth, with a depression 100 meters lower than surrounding geoid levels.
Traditionally linked to low-density mantle convection, but GRACE and GOCE satellite measurements suggest unexplained gravitational fluctuations.
Potential connection to fluctuating G: Could local energy density shifts contribute to gravity variations?
2.2 The Hudson Bay Gravity Anomaly (Canada)
A well-measured gravity deficit linked to mantle convection and post-glacial rebound.
Lower than expected gravitational acceleration, even after accounting for mass redistribution.
Could serve as a terrestrial test site for detecting localized time dilation effects.
2.3 The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA)
Known for its weakened magnetic field, which allows increased cosmic radiation exposure for satellites.
While primarily an electromagnetic anomaly, new studies suggest possible correlations with gravitational field variations.
If c and h fluctuate under extreme radiation exposure, could local gravity be subtly affected?
2.4 The Wilkes Land Gravity Anomaly (Antarctica)
A strong positive gravity anomaly beneath the East Antarctic Ice Sheet.
Some theories suggest it is the result of a massive asteroid impact, possibly altering local gravitational and quantum properties.
A test case for investigating whether extreme energy events affect local G values.
2.5 The Mariana Trench Gravity Anomaly
One of the deepest oceanic gravity lows, associated with the subduction of the Pacific Plate.
High-pressure environments could alter energy-mass interactions, serving as a test site for quantum gravitational effects.
3. Theoretical Framework: Fundamental Constant Variability
3.1 The More to C Hypothesis: Are Fundamental Constants Truly Constant?
The More to C Hypothesis suggests that fundamental constants fluctuate under specific conditions, particularly at extreme energy densities. This could mean that:
The speed of light (c) subtly shifts in high-energy environments.
Planck’s constant (h) varies slightly, altering quantum field interactions.
The gravitational constant (G) is an emergent property, not a true constant.
If G is variable, then gravity itself is not a fixed force but depends on local mass-energy conditions.
4. Experimental Methodologies: How to Detect Fundamental Variability
4.1 AI-Driven Gravitational Mapping
AI models trained on GRACE, GOCE, and atomic clock datasets can identify subtle gravitational fluctuations.
Machine learning can predict new anomalies based on existing gravitational and geophysical trends.
4.2 High-Precision Atomic Clock Experiments
Deploying synchronized atomic clocks across gravitational anomaly regions can reveal time dilation differences.
Time dilation experiments would provide direct evidence of local G variations.
4.3 Satellite-Based Geodesy and Energy Analysis
Comparing satellite gravity data to historical records can detect long-term shifts in fundamental constants.
Examining cosmic ray interactions in the SAA to test for electromagnetic-gravitational coupling.
5. Implications: Redefining Gravity and Fundamental Forces
If local variations in G exist, then:
Newtonian and Einsteinian models of gravity may require modifications.
Future space travel must account for localized gravitational fluctuations.
Fundamental physics may need a revised framework integrating fluctuating constants.
These anomalies could serve as Earth-based laboratories for testing new physics beyond general relativity.
6. Conclusion: A Call for Global Gravitational Research
This paper presents a framework for rethinking gravity through the lens of fundamental constant variability. The identified anomalies—ranging from the Indian Ocean to the South Atlantic and Antarctica—offer measurable, real-world test sites to investigate this phenomenon. AI-driven mapping, satellite geodesy, and precision atomic clock experiments may reveal hidden fluctuations in fundamental constants, challenging the assumption that G, c, and h remain fixed across all environments.
Future research must expand on these findings through AI-powered gravitational mapping and high-precision time dilation experiments, potentially unlocking a new era of gravitational physics.
References
Barrow, J. D. (1999). "Cosmologies with Varying Light Speed." Physical Review D.
Carroll, S. (2003). Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Addison-Wesley.
GRACE Mission (2023). Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Final Report. NASA.
ITER Organization (2021). Plasma Confinement and Stability in ITER.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration (2016). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger." Physical Review Letters, 116(6).
National Ignition Facility (2022). Advances in Inertial Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics. NIF Science Review.
Planck, M. (1901). "On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum." Annalen der Physik.
Syme Research Collective (2025). The More to C Hypothesis: Fundamental Constants and Energy Density. Syme Papers.
Explore More at Syme Papers: https://syme.ai/syme-papers
